Conditional risk and performance evaluation: Volatility timing, overconditioning, and new estimates of momentum alphas

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Financial Economics
Year: 2011
Volume: 102
Issue: 2
Pages: 363-389

Authors (4)

Boguth, Oliver (not in RePEc) Carlson, Murray (not in RePEc) Fisher, Adlai (University of British Columbia) Simutin, Mikhail (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Unconditional alphas are biased when conditional beta covaries with the market risk premium (market timing) or volatility (volatility timing). We demonstrate an additional bias (overconditioning) that can occur any time an empiricist estimates risk using information, such as a realized beta, that is not available to investors ex ante. Calibrating to U.S. equity returns, volatility timing and overconditioning can plausibly impact alphas more than market timing, which has been the focus of prior literature. To correct market- and volatility-timing biases without overconditioning, we show that incorporating realized betas into instrumental variables estimators is effective. Empirically, instrumentation reduces momentum alphas by 20–40%. Overconditioned alphas overstate performance by up to 2.5 times. We explain the sources of both the volatility-timing and overconditioning biases in momentum portfolios.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jfinec:v:102:y:2011:i:2:p:363-389
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25