Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from U.S. Federal Transfer Programs.

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2002
Volume: 113
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 25-35

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

While some recent evidence suggests that more decentralization is associated with reduced corruption, no empirical work has examined whether different types of decentralization have differential effects on corruption. The theoretical literature has emphasized that expenditure decentralization will only be effective if accompanied by the devolution of revenue generation to local governments. In this paper we examine this hypothesis empirically, by studying the mismatch between revenue generation and expenditure in U.S. states. Larger federal transfers are associated with higher rates of conviction for abuse of public office, supporting the theory that soft-budget constraints created by federal transfers are potentially problematic. Copyright 2002 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:113:y:2002:i:1-2:p:25-35
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25