Should We Give Up after Solyndra? Optimal Technology R&D Portfolios under Uncertainty

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Year: 2017
Volume: 4
Issue: S1
Pages: S123 - S151

Authors (4)

Mort Webster (not in RePEc) Karen Fisher-Vanden (Pennsylvania State University) David Popp (not in RePEc) Nidhi Santen (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Climate change and other environmental challenges require the development of new energy technologies with lower emissions. In the near term, R&D investments, either by the government or the private sector, can reduce the costs of these lower-emitting technologies. However, the returns to R&D are uncertain, and there are many potential technologies that may emerge to play an important role in the future energy mix. In this paper, we address the problem of allocating scarce R&D resources across technologies when uncertainties exist. We develop a multistage stochastic dynamic programming version of an integrated assessment model of the climate and economy that represents endogenous technological change through R&D decisions for two substitutable noncarbon backstop technologies. We demonstrate that near-term R&D investment in the higher cost technology is justified and that the optimal R&D investment in the higher cost technology increases with both higher variance and higher skewness in the distribution of returns to R&D.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/691995
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25