Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
This paper shows that HAC standard errors must be adjusted when constructing confidence intervals in regressions involving both the factors and idiosyncratic components estimated from a big dataset. This result is in contrast to the seminal result of Bai and Ng (2006) where the assumption that T∕N→0 is sufficient to eliminate the effect of estimation error, where T and N are the time-series and cross-sectional dimensions. Simulations show vast improvements in the coverage rates of the adjusted confidence intervals over the unadjusted ones.