Why factors facilitating collusion may not predict cartel occurrence — experimental evidence

C-Tier
Journal: Southern Economic Journal
Year: 2018
Volume: 85
Issue: 1
Pages: 255-275

Authors (3)

Miguel A. Fonseca (University of Exeter) Yan Li (not in RePEc) Hans‐Theo Normann (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Factors facilitating collusion may not successfully predict cartel occurrence: When a factor predicts that collusion (explicit and tacit) becomes easier, firms might be less inclined to set up a cartel simply because tacit coordination already tends to go in hand with supra‐competitive profits. We illustrate this issue with laboratory data. We run n‐firm Cournot experiments with written cheap‐talk communication between players and we compare them to treatments without the possibility to talk. We conduct this comparison for two, four, and six firms. We find that two firms indeed find it easier to collude tacitly but that the number of firms does not significantly affect outcomes with communication. As a result, the payoff gain from communication increases with the number of firms, at a decreasing rate.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:soecon:v:85:y:2018:i:1:p:255-275
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25