Limit pricing and the (in)effectiveness of the carbon tax

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Public Economics
Year: 2016
Volume: 139
Issue: C
Pages: 28-39

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We present a theory of limit-pricing monopoly in non-renewable-resource production. Facing a very inelastic demand, an oil monopoly seeks to induce the highest price that does not destroy its demand, unlike the conventional Hotellian analysis: The monopoly tolerates some ordinary substitutes to its oil but deters high-potential ones. With limit pricing, policy-induced extraction changes do not obey the usual logic. For example, oil taxes have no effect on current oil production. Extraction increases when high-potential substitutes are promoted, but can be effectively reduced by supporting ordinary substitutes. The carbon tax not only applies to oil; it also penalizes its ordinary (carbon) substitutes, whose market shares are taken over by the monopoly. Thus, the carbon tax ambiguously affects current and long-term oil production and carbon emissions.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:pubeco:v:139:y:2016:i:c:p:28-39
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-24