Experience Rating versus Employment Protection Laws in a Model where Firms Monitor Workers

B-Tier
Journal: Scandanavian Journal of Economics
Year: 2005
Volume: 107
Issue: 2
Pages: 299-314

Authors (2)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

While layoff costs in the U.S. are mostly due to experience‐rated unemployment insurance, layoff costs in European labour markets are primarily a consequence of employment protection laws. In this paper we compare the effects of experience rating and employment protection laws on employment and welfare in a model where unemployment arises due to efficiency wage setting and where labour turnover is inefficiently high. We show that a revenue‐neutral introduction of experience rating reduces labour turnover and increases employment and welfare. The introduction of employment protection laws may also reduce labour turnover but employment declines.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:scandj:v:107:y:2005:i:2:p:299-314
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25