Exogenous versus Endogenous Separation

A-Tier
Journal: American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics
Year: 2012
Volume: 4
Issue: 4
Pages: 68-93

Authors (2)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper assesses how various approaches to modeling the separation margin affect the quantitative ability of the Mortensen-Pissarides labor matching model. The model with a constant separation rate fails to produce realistic volatility and productivity responsiveness of the separation rate and worker flows. The specification with endogenous separation succeeds along these dimensions. Allowing for on-the-job search enables the model to replicate the Beveridge curve. All specifications, however, fail to generate sufficient volatility of the job finding rate. While adopting the Hagedorn-Manovskii calibration remedies this problem, the volume of job-to-job transitions in the on-the-job search specification becomes essentially zero. (JEL E24, J41, J64)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aejmac:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:68-93
Journal Field
Macro
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25