Does a mandatory telemedicine call prior to visiting a physician reduce costs or simply attract good risks?

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2011
Volume: 20
Issue: 10
Pages: 1257-1267

Authors (2)

Chantal Grandchamp (not in RePEc) Lucien Gardiol (Université de Lausanne)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper aims to estimate empirically the efficiency of a Swiss telemedicine service introduced in 2003. We used claims' data gathered by a major Swiss health insurer, over a period of 6 years and involving 160 000 insured adults. In Switzerland, health insurance is mandatory, but everyone has the option of choosing between a managed care plan and a fee‐for‐service plan. This paper focuses on a conventional fee‐for‐service plan including a mandatory access to a telemedicine service; the insured are obliged to phone this medical call centre before visiting a physician. This type of plan generates much lower average health expenditures than a conventional insurance plan. Reasons for this may include selection, incentive effects or efficiency. In our sample, about 90% of the difference in health expenditure can be explained by selection and incentive effects. The remaining 10% of savings due to the efficiency of the telemedicine service amount to about SFr 150 per year per insured, of which approximately 60% is saved by the insurer and 40% by the insured. Although the efficiency effect is greater than the cost of the plan, the big winners are the insured who not only save monetary and non‐monetary costs but also benefit from reduced premiums. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:20:y:2011:i:10:p:1257-1267
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25