Tradeoffs in the design of health plan payment systems: Fit, power and balance

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Health Economics
Year: 2016
Volume: 47
Issue: C
Pages: 1-19

Authors (2)

Geruso, Michael (University of Texas-Austin) McGuire, Thomas G. (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In many markets, including the new U.S. Marketplaces, health insurance plans are paid by risk-adjusted capitation, sometimes combined with reinsurance and other payment mechanisms. This paper proposes a framework for evaluating the de facto insurer incentives embedded in these complex payment systems. We discuss fit, power and balance, each of which addresses a distinct market failure in health insurance. We implement empirical metrics of fit, power, and balance in a study of Marketplace payment systems. Using data similar to that used to develop the Marketplace risk adjustment scheme, we quantify tradeoffs among the three classes of incentives. We show that an essential tradeoff arises between the goals of limiting costs and limiting cream skimming because risk adjustment, which is aimed at discouraging cream-skimming, weakens cost control incentives in practice. A simple reinsurance system scores better on our measures of fit, power and balance than the risk adjustment scheme in use in the Marketplaces.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jhecon:v:47:y:2016:i:c:p:1-19
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25