Learning-by-Doing and the Optimal Solar Policy in California

B-Tier
Journal: The Energy Journal
Year: 2008
Volume: 29
Issue: 3
Pages: 131-152

Authors (3)

Arthur van Benthem (not in RePEc) Kenneth Gillingham (Yale School of the Environment) James Sweeney (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Much policy attention has been given to promote fledgling energy technologies that promise to reduce our reliance onfossilfuels. These policies often aim to correct market failures, such as environmental externalities and learning-by-doing (LBD). We examine the implications of the assumption that LBD exists, quantifying the market failure due to LBD. We develop a model of technological advancement based on LBD and environmental market failures to examine the economically efficient level of subsidies in California’s solar photovoltaic market. Under central-case parameter estimates, including nonappropriable LBD, we find that maximizing net social benefits implies a solar subsidy schedule similar in magnitude to the recently implemented California Solar Initiative. This result holds for a wide range of LBD parameters. However, with no LBD, the subsidies cannot be justified by the environmental externality alone.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:sae:enejou:v:29:y:2008:i:3:p:131-152
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25