Soft money and hard choices: Why political parties might legislate against soft money donations

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2005
Volume: 123
Issue: 3
Pages: 411-438

Authors (2)

David Gill (Purdue University) Christine Lipsmeyer (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In contrast to the bulk of the campaign finance literature that highlights political action committee (PAC) contributions and single donations, this paper emphasizes soft money and the rationale for dual contributions. Employing a formal model of unregulated contributions and political access, we show that donors will rationally choose to contribute to both political parties. While the parties accept these dual contributions, they lead to an imbalance between the benefits of contributions and the costs of providing access. This race to acquire unlimited soft money leads to a situation where the parties agree to campaign finance reform legislation. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:123:y:2005:i:3:p:411-438
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25