Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and national income for three African countries

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 1997
Volume: 29
Issue: 4
Pages: 543-550

Authors (3)

M. I. Ansari (not in RePEc) D. V. Gordon (University of Calgary) C. Akuamoah (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The public expenditure/income hypothesis has long been debated in economics. Following Keynes, public expenditure is seen as an exogenous factor to be used as a policy instrument to influence growth. On the other hand, Wagner argues that expenditure is an endogenous factor or an outcome, not a cause, of growth in national income. The purpose of this paper is to apply both the Granger and Holmes-Hutton statistical procedures to test the income-expenditure hypothesis for three African countries-Ghana, Kenya and South Africa. We find that the hypothesis of public expenditure causing national income is not supported by the data for these African countries.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:29:y:1997:i:4:p:543-550
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25