Banks and shadow banks: Competitors or complements?

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Financial Intermediation
Year: 2016
Volume: 27
Issue: C
Pages: 118-131

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Bank managers can buy risky assets through a regulated bank and through an off-balance sheet special purpose vehicle (SPV). The choice of the preferred entity depends on whether bank managers can lower the cost of SPV funding by guaranteeing SPV returns with bank proceeds. When there are no guarantees, using the SPV is more profitable for high levels of the minimum capital requirement, in which case the SPV crowds out the bank. Contrary, when bank managers guarantee SPV returns, the bank needs to operate for the SPV to take advantage of recourse to the bank’s balance sheet also when the capital requirement is high. The bank and the SPV intermediation become complements.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jfinin:v:27:y:2016:i:c:p:118-131
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25