An Evaluation of Alternative Multiple Testing Methods for Finance Applications

B-Tier
Journal: Review of Asset Pricing Studies
Year: 2020
Volume: 10
Issue: 2
Pages: 199-248

Authors (4)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In almost every area of empirical finance, researchers confront multiple tests. One high-profile example is the identification of outperforming investment managers, many of whom beat their benchmarks purely by luck. Multiple testing methods are designed to control for luck. Factor selection is another glaring case in which multiple tests are performed, but numerous other applications do not receive as much attention. One important example is a simple regression model testing five variables. In this case, because five variables are tried, a t-statistic of 2.0 is not enough to establish significance. Our paper provides a guide to various multiple testing methods and details a number of applications. We provide simulation evidence on the relative performance of different methods across a variety of testing environments. The goal of our paper is to provide a menu that researchers can choose from to improve inference in financial economics.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rasset:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:199-248.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25