Bounds on ATE with discrete outcomes

C-Tier
Journal: Economics Letters
Year: 2010
Volume: 109
Issue: 1
Pages: 24-27

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The bounds on ATE by Chesher (2007) and Kitagawa (2009b) are compared. The difference between them is attributed to the scalar error assumption imposed by Chesher (2007).

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecolet:v:109:y:2010:i:1:p:24-27
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25