What Are We Weighting For?

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Human Resources
Year: 2015
Volume: 50
Issue: 2

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

When estimating population descriptive statistics, weighting is called for if needed to make the analysis sample representative of the target population. With regard to research directed instead at estimating causal effects, we discuss three distinct weighting motives: (1) to achieve precise estimates by correcting for heteroskedasticity; (2) to achieve consistent estimates by correcting for endogenous sampling; and (3) to identify average partial effects in the presence of unmodeled heterogeneity of effects. In each case, we find that the motive sometimes does not apply in situations where practitioners often assume it does.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:uwp:jhriss:v:50:y:2015:i:2:p:301-316
Journal Field
Labor
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25