Is low-priced primary care bad for quality? Evidence from Australian general practice

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 2018
Volume: 50
Issue: 5
Pages: 475-491

Authors (4)

Chunzhou Mu (not in RePEc) Richard De Abreu Lourenco (not in RePEc) Kees van Gool (not in RePEc) Jane Hall (University of Technology Sydne...)

Score contribution per author:

0.251 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We examine whether patients’ perceptions of general practitioner (GP) care varies by the price paid for consultations. Australian consumer survey data from 2275 individuals were used to analyse the relationship between price and patient experience of GP care. Using both standard models for count data and a latent class model that distinguishes between patients with high- and low-quality experiences, we find no evidence that lower prices have a negative impact on patients’ perceptions of GP quality. Nevertheless, some patient characteristics such as age, gender and health status play a significant role in quality-of-care perceptions. The results show that Australian patients have not had to compromise GP quality, as expressed in terms of patient experience, when seeking low-priced care. This supports the view that there are sufficient checks and balances on the GP sector in Australia to ensure positive patient experiences even for low-cost GP consultations.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:50:y:2018:i:5:p:475-491
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25