Dual track or academic route for auditors: does it matter?

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 2006
Volume: 38
Issue: 9
Pages: 1019-1035

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In the Netherlands auditors can be trained in a part-time educational track in which students combine working and studying or in a full-time educational track. The former training is relatively firm-specific whereas the latter training is relatively general. Applying human capital theory, we expect higher wage growth for full-time educated auditors than for dual-educated auditors. Furthermore, full-time educated auditors may have better outside options than part-time educated auditors. This may make it easier for them to switch employers than for the part-time educated auditors. The predictions on tenure and wages of differently educated auditors are supported by the estimation results in this paper. The part-time, dual track appears an important route for students from a lower socioeconomic background.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:38:y:2006:i:9:p:1019-1035
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25