The Incidence of Public Spending on Healthcare: Comparative Evidence from Asia

B-Tier
Journal: World Bank Economic Review
Year: 2007
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Pages: 93-123

Authors (18)

Owen O'Donnell (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) Eddy van Doorslaer (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) Ravi P. Rannan-Eliya (not in RePEc) Aparnaa Somanathan (not in RePEc) Shiva Raj Adhikari (not in RePEc) Deni Harbianto (not in RePEc) Charu C. Garg (not in RePEc) Piya Hanvoravongchai (Chulalongkorn University, Facu...) Mohammed N. Huq (not in RePEc) Anup Karan (not in RePEc) Gabriel M. Leung (not in RePEc) Chiu Wan Ng (not in RePEc) Badri Raj Pande (not in RePEc) Keith Tin (not in RePEc) Kanjana Tisayaticom (not in RePEc) Laksono Trisnantoro (not in RePEc) Yuhui Zhang (not in RePEc) Yuxin Zhao (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.112 = (α=2.01 / 18 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The article compares the incidence of public healthcare across 11 Asian countries and provinces, testing the dominance of healthcare concentration curves against an equal distribution and Lorenz curves and across countries. The analysis reveals that the distribution of public healthcare is prorich in most developing countries. That distribution is avoidable, but a propoor incidence is easier to realize at higher national incomes. The experiences of Malaysia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand suggest that increasing the incidence of propoor healthcare requires limiting the use of user fees, or protecting the poor effectively from them, and building a wide network of health facilities. Economic growth may not only relax the government budget constraint on propoor policies but also increase propoor incidence indirectly by raising richer individuals' demand for private sector alternatives. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:wbecrv:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:93-123
Journal Field
Development
Author Count
18
Added to Database
2026-01-25