Testing for the cartel in OPEC: non-cooperative collusion or just non-cooperative?

C-Tier
Journal: Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Year: 2011
Volume: 27
Issue: 1
Pages: 144-168

Authors (3)

Pedro A. Almoguera (not in RePEc) Christopher C. Douglas (not in RePEc) Ana María Herrera (University of Kentucky)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper extends the framework of Green and Porter (1984) and Porter (1983a) to encompass the case of a cartel (OPEC) faced by a competitive fringe (non-OPEC oil producers). Estimation of a simultaneous equation switching regression model allows us to examine which market structure better characterizes the world oil market during the 1974--2004 period and to test whether switches between collusive and non-cooperative behaviour occurred. The null hypothesis that no switch occurred is rejected in favour of the alternative that both cooperative and non-cooperative behaviour was observed. We find that, although there were periods in which oil prices were measurably higher owing to collusion among OPEC members, overall OPEC has not been effective in systematically raising prices above Cournot competition levels. Our results suggest that, on average over the period of study, OPEC's behaviour is best described as Cournot competition in the face of a competitive fringe constituted by non-OPEC producers. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:oxford:v:27:y:2011:i:1:p:144-168
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25