Competition through Commissions and Kickbacks

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2012
Volume: 102
Issue: 2
Pages: 780-809

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In markets for retail financial products and health services, consumers often rely on the advice of intermediaries to decide which specialized offering best fits their needs. Product providers, in turn, compete to influence the intermediaries' advice through hidden kickbacks or disclosed commissions. Motivated by the controversial role of these widespread practices, we formulate a model to analyze competition through commissions from a positive and normative standpoint. The model highlights the role of commissions in making the advisor responsive to supply-side incentives. We characterize situations when commonly adopted policies such as mandatory disclosure and caps on commissions have unintended welfare consequences. (JEL D21, D82, D83, G21, L15, L25)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:102:y:2012:i:2:p:780-809
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25