A Prudential Paradox: The Signal in (Not) Restricting Bank Dividends

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking
Year: 2024
Volume: 56
Issue: 2-3
Pages: 537-568

Authors (3)

LEVENT GÜNTAY (not in RePEc) STEFAN JACEWITZ (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas...) JONATHAN POGACH (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.673 = (α=2.02 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

By restricting dividends in the weakest banks, prudential regulators counterintuitively induce more capital payouts in marginal banks. The potential for bank runs exacerbates the incentive to signal strength through dividend payments. Regulatory restrictions on those payments can be used to achieve the first‐best outcome, but only if the prevailing capital requirements are sufficiently high. In a crisis, the optimal dividend policy is more restrictive, since it allows the weak but solvent banks to pool with the strong. Finally, we show that the optimal release of regulatory bank information depends critically on the regulator's information and dividend restriction policies.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:jmoncb:v:56:y:2024:i:2-3:p:537-568
Journal Field
Macro
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25