Quality revealing versus overstating in equity crowdfunding

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Corporate Finance
Year: 2020
Volume: 65
Issue: C

Authors (2)

Johan, Sofia (Universiteit van Tilburg) Zhang, Yelin (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of qualitative business information on mitigating information asymmetry between equity crowdfunding entrepreneurs and investors. Qualitative business information covers the entrepreneurs' introduction on business model, competitive strategy, product market, drivers and barriers for product/service adoption and business milestones. Empirical data reveal that, overall, more detailed disclosure of qualitative business information leads to better fundraising outcome. However, while entrepreneurs' excessive use of promotional language, or self-praise on business quality without factual support, is not rewarded by sophisticated investors, ordinary investors are less resistant to promotional language. We also find that Title III of the JOBS Act results in a reduction of the percentage of completed fundraisings but exacerbates the effect of project description on the percentage of completed fundraisings.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:corfin:v:65:y:2020:i:c:s0929119920301851
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25