The Carnegie Conjecture: Some Empirical Evidence

S-Tier
Journal: Quarterly Journal of Economics
Year: 1993
Volume: 108
Issue: 2
Pages: 413-435

Authors (3)

Douglas Holtz-Eakin (not in RePEc) David Joulfaian (Government of the United State...) Harvey S. Rosen (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper examines tax-return-generated data on the labor force behavior of people before and after they receive inheritances. The results are consistent with Andrew Carnegie's century-old assertion that large inheritances decrease a person's labor force participation. For example, a single person who receives an inheritance of about $150,000 is roughly four times more likely to leave the labor force than a person with an inheritance below $25,000. Additional, albeit weaker, evidence suggests that large inheritances depress labor supply, even when participation is unaltered. Warren Kendall … heir to an insurance company fortune … says he's worth about $5 million and has an income of "about, oh, $300 and some thousand a year." [H]e has never held a job, or wanted to. Going down to sea in cruise ships is his full-time pursuit. He estimates that he has taken about 250 cruises over the past couple of decades, spending at least 50 percent to 70 percent of the year afloat [Morgenthaler, 1991, p. Al].

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:qjecon:v:108:y:1993:i:2:p:413-435.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25