Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives Matter

B-Tier
Journal: Review of Finance
Year: 2009
Volume: 13
Issue: 1
Pages: 115-145

Authors (3)

Shane A. Johnson (Texas A&M University) Harley E. Ryan (not in RePEc) Yisong S. Tian (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Operating performance and stock return results imply that managers who commit fraud anticipate large stock price declines if they were to report truthfully, which would cause greater losses for managerial stockholdings than for options because of differences in convexity. Fraud firms have significantly greater incentives from unrestricted stockholdings than control firms do, and unrestricted stockholdings are their largest incentive source. Our results emphasize the importance of the shape and vesting status of incentive payoffs in providing incentives to commit fraud. Fraud firms also have characteristics that suggest a lower likelihood of fraud detection, which implies lower expected costs of fraud. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:revfin:v:13:y:2009:i:1:p:115-145
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25