Do Capital Requirements Make Banks Safer? Evidence From a Quasinatural Experiment

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Year: 2022
Volume: 57
Issue: 5
Pages: 1805-1833

Authors (4)

Bostandzic, Denefa (not in RePEc) Irresberger, Felix (not in RePEc) Juelsrud, Ragnar E. (Norges Bank) Weiß, Gregor (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We use the EBA capital exercise of 2011 as a quasinatural experiment to investigate how capital requirements affect various measures of bank solvency risk. We show that, while regulatory measures of solvency improve, nonregulatory measures indicate a deterioration in bank solvency in response to higher capital requirements. The decline in bank solvency is driven by a permanent reduction in banks’ market value of equity. This finding is consistent with a reduction in bank profitability, rather than a repricing of bank equity due to a reduction of implicit and explicit too-big-too-fail guarantees. We then discuss alternative policies to improve bank solvency.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:cup:jfinqa:v:57:y:2022:i:5:p:1805-1833_5
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25