Talking Numbers: Technical versus fundamental investment recommendations

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2018
Volume: 92
Issue: C
Pages: 100-114

Authors (3)

Avramov, Doron (not in RePEc) Kaplanski, Guy (Bar Ilan University) Levy, Haim (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Market efficiency is often evaluated through the ability of fundamental analysis or technical trading rules to exploit predictable patterns in asset prices. The evidence following decades of empirical research is mixed. This paper reexamines the evidence using a novel database from the TV show “Talking Numbers.” We assess the performance of 1,599 investment recommendations, where each recommendation features a fundamental and a technical forecast. We show that technicians are able to predict individual stock returns to economically significant degrees up to a one-year horizon. Beyond that, the null hypothesis of market efficiency is not rejected for market-wide indices, equity sectors, bonds, or commodities.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:100-114
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25