Essential work and emergency childcare: identifying gender differences in COVID-19 effects on labour demand and supply

C-Tier
Journal: Oxford Economic Papers
Year: 2023
Volume: 75
Issue: 2
Pages: 393-417

Authors (3)

Jordy Meekes (not in RePEc) Wolter H J Hassink (not in RePEc) Guyonne Kalb (University of Melbourne)

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We examine whether the COVID-19 crisis affects women and men differently in terms of employment, working hours, and hourly wages, and whether the effects are demand or supply driven. COVID-19 impacts are studied using administrative data on all Dutch employees up to December 2020, focussing on the national lockdowns and emergency childcare for essential workers in the Netherlands. First, the impact of COVID-19 is much larger for non-essential workers than for essential workers. Although female non-essential workers are more affected than male non-essential workers, on average, women and men are equally affected, because more women than men are essential workers. Second, the impact for partnered essential workers with young children, both men and women, is not larger than for others. Third, single-parent essential workers respond with relatively large reductions in labour supply, suggesting emergency childcare was insufficient for them. Overall, labour demand effects appear larger than labour supply effects.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:oxecpp:v:75:y:2023:i:2:p:393-417.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25