How Anti-merger Laws Can Reduce Investment, Help Producers, and Hurt Consumers.

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Industrial Economics
Year: 1992
Volume: 40
Issue: 3
Pages: 339-48

Authors (2)

Gatsios, Konstantine (not in RePEc) Karp, Larry S (University of California-Berke...)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

If capital lowers marginal cost and a firm with more capital gets a bigger share of the surplus in merger bargaining, then the equilibrium price with a merger may be lower than without a merger. If entry is restricted, the level of industry profits minus investment costs may be higher if mergers are prohibited. Thus, a regulatory climate that permits mergers may harm firms and benefit consumers. Copyright 1992 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jindec:v:40:y:1992:i:3:p:339-48
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25