Are Corporate Default Probabilities Consistent with the Static Trade-off Theory?

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2012
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 315-340

Authors (3)

Armen Hovakimian (not in RePEc) Ayla Kayhan (Louisiana State University) Sheridan Titman (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Default probability plays a central role in the static trade-off theory of capital structure. We directly test this theory by regressing the probability of default on proxies for costs and benefits of debt. Contrary to predictions of the theory, firms with higher bankruptcy costs, i.e., smaller firms and firms with lower asset tangibility, choose capital structures with higher bankruptcy risk. Further analysis suggests that the capital structures of smaller firms with lower asset tangibility--which tend to have less access to capital markets--are more sensitive to negative profitability and equity value shocks, making them more susceptible to bankruptcy risk. The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]., Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:25:y:2012:i:2:p:315-340
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25