Pareto-improving firing costs?

B-Tier
Journal: European Economic Review
Year: 2011
Volume: 55
Issue: 8
Pages: 1083-1093

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We examine self-enforcing contracts between risk-averse workers and risk-neutral firms (the ‘invisible handshake’) in a labor market with search frictions. Employers promise as much wage-smoothing as they can, consistent with incentive conditions that ensure they will not renege during low-profitability times. Equilibrium is inefficient if these incentive constraints bind, with risky wages for workers and a risk premium that employers must pay. Mandatory firing costs can help, by making it easier for employers to promise credibly not to cut wages in low-profitability periods. We show that firing costs are more likely to be Pareto-improving if they are not severance payments.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:eecrev:v:55:y:2011:i:8:p:1083-1093
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25