The Incidence of an Oil Glut: Who Benefits from Cheap Crude Oil in the Midwest?

B-Tier
Journal: The Energy Journal
Year: 2014
Volume: 35
Issue: 1
Pages: 15-34

Authors (2)

Severin Borenstein (not in RePEc) Ryan Kellogg (University of Chicago)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Beginning in early 2011, crude oil production in the U.S. Midwest and Canada surpassed the pipeline capacity to transport it to the Gulf Coast where it could access the world oil market. As a result, the U.S. “benchmark” crude oil price in Cushing, Oklahoma, declined substantially relative to internationally traded oil. In this paper, we study how this development affected prices for refined products, focusing on the markets for motor gasoline and diesel. We find that the relative decrease in Midwest crude oil prices did not pass through to wholesale gasoline and diesel prices. This result is consistent with evidence that the marginal gallon of fuel in the Midwest is still imported from coastal locations. Our findings imply that investments in new pipeline infrastructure between the Midwest and the Gulf Coast, such as the southern segment of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, will not raise gasoline prices in the Midwest.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:sae:enejou:v:35:y:2014:i:1:p:15-34
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25