Do Market Efficiency Measures Yield Correct Inferences? A Comparison of Developed and Emerging Markets

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2010
Volume: 23
Issue: 8
Pages: 3225-3277

Authors (3)

John M. Griffin (not in RePEc) Patrick J. Kelly (University of Melbourne) Federico Nardari (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Using data from 56 markets, we find that short-term reversal, post-earnings drift, and momentum strategies earn similar returns in emerging and developed markets. Variance ratios and market delay measures often show greater deviations from random walk pricing in developed markets. Conceptually, we show that commonly used efficiency tests can yield misleading inferences because they do not control for the information environment. Our evidence corrects misperceptions that emerging markets feature larger trading profits and higher return autocorrelation, highlights crucial limitations of weak and semi-strong form efficiency measures, and points to the importance of measuring informational aspects of efficiency. The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]., Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:23:y:2010:i:8:p:3225-3277
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25