Gender bias and statistical discrimination against female instructors in student evaluations of teaching

B-Tier
Journal: Labour Economics
Year: 2020
Volume: 66
Issue: C

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper uses administrative data from a public university in Taiwan to examine gender bias in teaching evaluations. We test for statistical discrimination against female instructors using the employer learning model in which the instructor value-added to the grades of the current course and follow-on course is used to measure teaching effectiveness. The results show that statistical discrimination is a significant source of gender bias in teaching evaluations, especially among male students and in STEM departments where female faculty is underrepresented. Gender bias in teaching evaluations was reduced by nearly 50% after ten years of teaching. The results also suggest that the gender gap in teaching evaluations changes over time as male and female students evaluate male and female instructors differentially. Statistical discrimination is closely related to the underrepresentation of women in academia. For female students, the gender gap in evaluation scores narrows when the share of female faculty in the department rises. By contrast, male students are less sensitive to the percentage of female faculty in the department.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:labeco:v:66:y:2020:i:c:s0927537120300932
Journal Field
Labor
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25