Carbon abatement in the fuel market with biofuels: Implications for second best policies

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Year: 2014
Volume: 67
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-103

Authors (2)

Crago, Christine Lasco (not in RePEc) Khanna, Madhu (University of Illinois at Urba...)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

A carbon tax on fuel would penalize carbon intensive fuels like gasoline and shift fuel consumption to less carbon intensive alternatives like biofuels. Since biofuel production competes for land with agricultural production, a carbon tax could increase land rents and raise food prices. This paper analyzes the welfare effect of a carbon tax on fuel consisting of gasoline and biofuel in the presence of a labor tax, with and without a biofuel subsidy. The market impacts of a carbon tax are also compared with that of a subsidy. Findings show that if a carbon tax increases biofuel demand, the tax interaction effect due to higher fuel prices is exacerbated by higher land rent and food prices and greater erosion of the carbon tax base. Thus, the second best optimal carbon tax for fuel is lower with biofuel in the fuel mix, especially if biofuel is subsidized.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeeman:v:67:y:2014:i:2:p:89-103
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25