A note on Chui, Gai and Haldane's "Sovereign liquidity crisis: Analytics and implications for public policy"

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2008
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 624-629

Authors (2)

Dreisbach, Dina (not in RePEc) Kindermann, Fabian (Universität Regensburg)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This note corrects the welfare calculations in Chui, Gai and Haldane's paper on sovereign liquidity crisis [Chui, M., Gai, P., Haldane, A.G., 2002. Sovereign liquidity crisis: Analytics and implications for public policy. Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 519-544]. We show that the exact formula not only dramatically reduces the computed welfare consequences from 66% of ex-ante expected output to roughly 13%, but also changes the direction of some reported comparative static results. In addition, we clarify the difference between fundamentals-driven and belief-driven welfare costs and extend some of the sensitivity calculations.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:32:y:2008:i:4:p:624-629
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25