Would depositors pay to show that they do not withdraw? Theory and experiment

A-Tier
Journal: Experimental Economics
Year: 2020
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
Pages: 873-894

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Abstract In a Diamond–Dybvig type model of financial intermediation, we allow depositors to announce at a positive cost to subsequent depositors that they keep their funds deposited in the bank. Theoretically, the mere availability of public announcements (and not its use) ensures that no bank run is the unique equilibrium outcome. Multiple equilibria—including bank run—exist without such public announcements. We test the theoretical results in the lab and find a widespread use of announcements, which we interpret as an attempt to coordinate on the no bank run outcome. Withdrawal rates in general are lower in information sets that contain announcements.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:expeco:v:23:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10683-020-09646-y
Journal Field
Experimental
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25