Taking stock of long-horizon predictability tests: Are factor returns predictable?

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Econometrics
Year: 2023
Volume: 237
Issue: 2

Authors (3)

Kostakis, Alexandros (University of Liverpool) Magdalinos, Tassos (not in RePEc) Stamatogiannis, Michalis P. (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This study provides a critical assessment of long-horizon return predictability tests using highly persistent regressors. We show that the commonly used statistics are typically oversized, leading to spurious inference. Instead, we propose a Wald statistic, which accommodates multiple predictors of (unknown) arbitrary persistence degree within the I(0)-I(1) range. The test statistic, based on an adaptation of the IVX procedure to a long-horizon regression framework, is shown to have a standard chi-squared asymptotic distribution (regardless of the stochastic properties of the regressors used as predictors) and to exhibit excellent finite-sample size and power properties. Employing this test statistic, we find evidence of predictability for “old” and “new” pricing factors with monthly returns, but this becomes weaker as the predictive horizon increases. The predictability evidence substantially weakens with annual data. Overall, we question the incremental value of using long-horizon predictive regressions.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:econom:v:237:y:2023:i:2:s0304407623000052
Journal Field
Econometrics
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25