Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
This paper reconsiders the risk-shifting problem of banks and presents a novel rationale for macroprudential regulation. The interplay between this agency problem and equilibrium investment creates a welfare-reducing pecuniary externality that causes capital misallocation and excessive bank risk taking. Therefore, the banking sector tends to be too large, under-capitalized, and inefficiently risky. This distortion is independent of typical frictions like government guarantees or default costs. Macroprudential regulation with capital requirements or deposit rate ceilings corrects misallocation thereby magnifying rent opportunities for banks to reduce risk shifting. Regulation is, however, no Pareto improvement and causes redistribution from households to bank owners.