A fairer deal on fees: Our thoughts on alignment of manager fees

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2021
Volume: 34
Issue: 8
Pages: 3880-3934

Authors (4)

Aleksandar Andonov (not in RePEc) Roman Kräussl (City St George's) Joshua Rauh (not in RePEc) Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Institutional investors expect infrastructure to deliver long-term stable returns but gain exposure to infrastructure predominantly through finite-horizon closed private funds. The cash flows delivered by infrastructure funds display similar volatility and cyclicality as other private equity investments, and their performance similarly depends on quick deal exits. Despite weak risk-adjusted performance and failure to match the supposed characteristics of infrastructure assets, closed funds have received more commitments over time, particularly from public investors. Public institutional investors perform worse than private institutional investors. ESG preferences and regulations explain 25–40 of their increased allocation to infrastructure and 30 of their underperformance.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:8:p:3880-3934.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25