When is market incompleteness irrelevant for the price of aggregate risk (and when is it not)?

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Theory
Year: 2010
Volume: 145
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-41

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In a standard incomplete markets model with a continuum of households that have constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) preferences, the absence of insurance markets for idiosyncratic labor income risk has no effect on the premium for aggregate risk if the distribution of idiosyncratic risk is independent of aggregate shocks and aggregate consumption growth is independent over time. In equilibrium, households only use the stock market to smooth consumption; the bond market is inoperative. Furthermore, the cross-sectional distributions of wealth and consumption are not affected by aggregate shocks. These results hold regardless of the persistence of idiosyncratic shocks, even when households face tight solvency constraints. A weaker irrelevance result survives when we allow for predictability in aggregate consumption growth.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jetheo:v:145:y:2010:i:1:p:1-41
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25