Loading...

← Back to Leaderboard

John Brazier

Global rank #5736 93%

Institution: University of Sheffield

Primary Field: Health (weighted toward more recent publications)

Homepage: http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/heds/staff/brazier_j

First Publication: 1993

Most Recent: 2018

RePEc ID: pbr766 ↗

Publication Scores

Scores use coauthorship adjustment: α/n credit per paper, where n = number of authors. α = 2.01: calibrated so average adjusted count equals average raw count (a zero-sum adjustment).

Period S (4x) A (2x) B (1x) C (½x) Total
Last 5 Years 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Last 10 Years 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 1.01
All Time 0.00 0.00 14.99 0.00 14.99

Publication Statistics

Raw Publications 24
Coauthorship-Adjusted Count 15.05

Publications (24)

Year Article Journal Tier Authors
2018 EQ‐5D‐5L: Smaller steps but a major step change? Health Economics B 3
2016 Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health‐State Values for the Child Health Utility‐9D Using Profile Case Best–Worst Scaling Health Economics B 6
2014 AN AUSTRALIAN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT TO VALUE EQ‐5D HEALTH STATES Health Economics B 7
2012 Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values Journal of Health Economics B 4
2012 Valuing states from multiple measures on the same visual analogue sale: a feasibility study Health Economics B 4
2007 Modelling SF-6D health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method Journal of Health Economics B 4
2007 Multi-attribute utility function or statistical inference models: A comparison of health state valuation models using the HUI2 health state classification system Journal of Health Economics B 4
2007 ‘Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in CUA’ by Parkin and Devlin a response: ‘yes there is a case, but what does it add to ordinal data?’ Health Economics B 2
2007 A comparison of patient and population values for health states in varicose veins patients Health Economics B 4
2006 Mapping between Visual Analogue Scale and Standard Gamble data; results from the UK Health Utilities Index 2 valuation survey Health Economics B 3
2006 Erratum to ‘Health state values for the health utilities index mark 2 descriptive system: results from a UK valuation survey’ Health Economics 2005; 14(3): 231–244 Health Economics B 4
2006 Using rank data to estimate health state utility models Journal of Health Economics B 7
2006 Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Patient‐assigned utility scores for IBS‐related health states and profiles Health Economics B 4
2006 Discounting and cost‐effectiveness in NICE – stepping back to sort out a confusion Health Economics B 8
2006 Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets Journal of Health Economics B 3
2005 Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra Health Economics B 8
2005 Health state values for the HUI 2 descriptive system: results from a UK survey Health Economics B 4
2004 A comparison of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D across seven patient groups Health Economics B 4
2003 A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF‐6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index Health Economics B 6
2002 Measures of health‐related quality of life in an imperfect world: a comment on Dowie Health Economics B 2
2002 The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 Journal of Health Economics B 3
1999 A checklist for judging preference‐based measures of health related quality of life: Learning from psychometrics Health Economics B 2
1995 The use of condition specific outcome measures in economic appraisal Health Economics B 2
1993 The SF‐36 health survey questionnaire—a tool for economists Health Economics B 1