Institution: University of Warwick
Primary Field: Theory (weighted toward more recent publications)
Scores use coauthorship adjustment: α/n credit per paper, where n = number of authors. α = 2.02: calibrated so average adjusted count equals average raw count (a zero-sum adjustment).
| Period | S (4x) | A (2x) | B (1x) | C (½x) | Total | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 Years | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Last 10 Years | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 35% |
| All Time | 2.02 | 1.01 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 5.62 | 83% |
| Year | Article | Journal | Tier | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Focal points and payoff information in tacit bargaining | Games and Economic Behavior | B | 4 |
| 2018 | Boundedly rational expected utility theory | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty | B | 5 |
| 2016 | Do markets reveal preferences or shape them? | Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization | B | 4 |
| 2014 | Beyond choice: investigating the sensitivity and validity of measures of strength of preference | Experimental Economics | A | 4 |
| 2014 | Efficiency, Equality, and Labeling: An Experimental Investigation of Focal Points in Explicit Bargaining | American Economic Review | S | 4 |
| 2013 | Focal points in tacit bargaining problems: Experimental evidence | European Economic Review | B | 4 |
| 2012 | Testing the ‘standard’ model of stochastic choice under risk | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty | B | 3 |
| 2011 | The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment | American Economic Review | S | 3 |