Institution: Unknown
Primary Field: Environment (weighted toward more recent publications)
Scores use coauthorship adjustment: α/n credit per paper, where n = number of authors. α = 2.02: calibrated so average adjusted count equals average raw count (a zero-sum adjustment).
| Period | S (4x) | A (2x) | B (1x) | C (½x) | Total | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 Years | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Last 10 Years | 0.00 | 1.35 | 2.02 | 0.84 | 4.20 | 67% |
| All Time | 0.00 | 1.35 | 2.69 | 0.84 | 4.88 | 81% |
| Year | Article | Journal | Tier | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Does attribute order influence attribute-information processing in discrete choice experiments? | Resource and Energy Economics | C | 3 |
| 2019 | Combining Risk Attitudes in a Lottery Game and Flood Risk Protection Decisions in a Discrete Choice Experiment | Environmental & Resource Economics | B | 3 |
| 2018 | Substitution Effects and Spatial Preference Heterogeneity in Single- and Multiple-Site Choice Experiments | Land Economics | C | 2 |
| 2017 | Choice Consistency and Preference Stability in Test-Retests of Discrete Choice Experiment and Open-Ended Willingness to Pay Elicitation Formats | Environmental & Resource Economics | B | 3 |
| 2016 | Hydropower externalities: A meta-analysis | Energy Economics | A | 3 |
| 2016 | Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis | Ecological Economics | B | 3 |
| 2015 | Towards a fair, constructive and consistent criticism of all valuation languages: Comment on Kallis et al. (2013) | Ecological Economics | B | 3 |