Was privateering plunder efficient?

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2011
Volume: 79
Issue: 3
Pages: 303-317

Authors (2)

Leeson, Peter T. (George Mason University) Nowrasteh, Alex (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper argues that when contracts between enemies are enforceable and transaction costs are low, plunderers and their victims benefit from trade that facilitates the former's ability to plunder the latter. Coasean "plunder contracts" transform part of plunder's social costs into private benefits for plunderers and their victims. A significant portion of the wealth that plunder would otherwise destroy is preserved instead. The result is more efficient plunder. To investigate our hypothesis we consider maritime marauding in the 18th and 19th centuries. Privateers developed a system of ransom and parole founded on Coasean plunder contracts with victim merchantmen.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:79:y:2011:i:3:p:303-317
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25