Bicameralism and Its Consequences for the Internal Organization of Legislatures

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 1999
Volume: 89
Issue: 5
Pages: 1182-1196

Authors (2)

Roger B. Myerson (University of Chicago) Daniel Diermeier (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Theories of organization of legislatures have mainly focused on the U.S. Congress, explaining why committee systems emerge there, but not explaining variance in organization across legislatures of different countries. To analyze the effects of different constitutional features on the internal organization of legislatures, we adopt a vote-buying model and consider the incentives to delegate decision rights in a game among legislative chambers. We show how presidential veto power and bicameral separation can encourage a legislative chamber to create internal veto players or supermajority rules, while a unicameral structure can encourage legislators to delegate power to a leader.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:89:y:1999:i:5:p:1182-1196
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-26