A wind tunnel test of wind farm auctions

A-Tier
Journal: Energy Economics
Year: 2025
Volume: 152
Issue: C

Authors (4)

Li, Xinyu (not in RePEc) Haan, Marco A. (not in RePEc) Onderstal, Sander (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Veldman, Jasper (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Globally, governments increasingly rely on auctions to advance renewable energy. We study the design of wind farm auctions and analyze the impact of price guarantees and subsidies. While in the theoretical analysis the price guarantee has no effect, our laboratory experiment suggests that it improves efficiency and often increases production and revenue. The price guarantee turns out to nullify correlations between participants’ willingness to take risks and their bids, which, in turn, improves efficiency relative to the case without price guarantee. The subsidy is less effective than suggested by theory. Bidders with a higher valuation tend to bid more conservatively than the equilibrium prediction, thus neutralizing the efficiency-enhancing effect of the subsidy. Our results may have implications for other auctions in which rights are allocated to enter markets characterized by heavy upfront investments and uncertainty about future payoffs.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:eneeco:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s014098832500814x
Journal Field
Energy
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-26