Hidden action and outcome contractibility: An experimental test of moral hazard theory

B-Tier
Journal: Games and Economic Behavior
Year: 2018
Volume: 109
Issue: C
Pages: 544-564

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In a laboratory experiment with 754 participants, we study the canonical one-shot moral hazard problem, comparing treatments with unobservable effort to benchmark treatments with verifiable effort. In our experiment, the players endogenously negotiate contracts. In line with contract theory, the contractibility of the outcome plays a crucial role when effort is a hidden action. If the outcome is contractible, most players overcome the hidden action problem by agreeing on incentive-compatible contracts. Communication is helpful, since it may reduce strategic uncertainty. If the outcome is non-contractible, in most cases low effort is chosen whenever effort is a hidden action. However, communication leads the players to agree on larger wages and substantially mitigates the underprovision of effort.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:gamebe:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:544-564
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-29