The puzzle of missing female engineers: Academic preparation, ability beliefs, and preferences

B-Tier
Journal: Economics of Education Review
Year: 2018
Volume: 64
Issue: C
Pages: 129-143

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper uses administrative North Carolina data linked from high school to college and national surveys to characterize the largest contributor to the STEM gender gap: engineering. Disparities are the result of differential entry during high school or earlier rather than postsecondary exit. Differences in pre-college academic preparation account for 5 to 7% of the gap. Females’ relative lack of academic self-confidence explains 8%, while other-regarding preferences and professional goals capture a further 14%. Empirical evidence using identifying variation in the gender composition of twins in North Carolina shows that opposite-sex pairs are more likely to pursue gender-stereotypical majors.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecoedu:v:64:y:2018:i:c:p:129-143
Journal Field
Education
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-29